How can economics help governments decide how to spend scarce public funds?
In the UK, and across Europe, there are many public-funded areas crying out for more investment. However, the context of low growth, high levels of public debt and public interest payments, mean that tough decisions on spending priorities across public services, infrastructure and social security have to be made.
In this episode of Top of the Agenda, Helen Jenkins is joined by Sir Philip Rutnam, Chair of the Council of the National Institute for Economic and Social Research, and former Permanent Secretary at the UK Department for Transport and Home Office, and Andy Meaney, a Partner and Head of Transport at Oxera. Together they discuss how governments can use economic analysis to decide how to spend scarce public funds. How should we allocate funds to health, transport, education or social support? And then once those decisions are made, do we opt for fewer potholes or more bus services; more or better-paid doctors, or more MRI machines?
Listen and subscribe to the Top of the Agenda podcast series on Spotify, Apple or via your favourite podcast platform.
Related
Switching tracks: the regulatory implications of Great British Railways—part 2
In this two-part series, we delve into the regulatory implications of rail reform. This reform will bring significant changes to the industry’s structure, including the nationalisation of private passenger train operations and the creation of Great British Railways (GBR)—a vertically integrated body that will manage both track and operations for… Read More
Cost–benefit analyses for public policy
Cost–benefit analyses (CBA) are commonly applied to public infrastructure projects where there is a degree of certainty about the physical output of the project and the consequent societal benefits. CBA can also be applied to proposed policy and regulatory changes, but there is less clarity about the outcomes and the… Read More